3. Biotech Press Lounge at the IZB

3. Biotech Press Lounge at the IZB

On 13 October 2016, managing directors and press officers of biotech, pharmaceutical and venture capital companies, as well as journalists, were meeting at the Faculty Club G2B of the IZB in Martinsried near Munich. There were three compact presentations held before a networking lunch:

  • “Therapy advantage in cardiology through biotech” Dr. Stefan Kropff (Executive Medical Director, Amgen GmbH)
  • “How to turn dust into stone with the help of bacteria”
    Martin Spitznagel (Managing Director, Dust Biosolutions)
  • “New genomic methods for blood analysis:
    Liquid Biopsies” Dr. Rainer Schubbert (Head of Operations Applied Genomics,
    Eurofins Genomics)

For Staburo it was very exciting to see what is developed currently at the IZB in Munich, but also to learn about the successful history of several companies. As a specialised service provider for biostatistics solutions, it was also very interesting to meet current and potential clients in a relaxed atmosphere – we will definitely take part in more IZB events in the future!

The next Biotech Press Lounges will be on 16 February 2017, 11 May 2017 and 12 October 2017. Reservations can be made at marketing@izb-online.de.

New “old” employees

New “old” employees

We are very glad to welcome Vicky Stahl and Maximilian Siebold back in our team. Vicky and Max already worked as student interns at Staburo earlier and will support our clients in the area of statistical programming. We are very happy to have you back in the team!

 

Training@Staburo: Equivalence and non-inferiority trials

Training@Staburo: Equivalence and non-inferiority trials

The statistical principles of equivalence trials and non-inferiority, as well as the special case bioequivalence, were presented. From a statistical perspective, being non-inferior or bioequivalent means to be only irrelevantly inferior or different, respectively. Based on this idea, the null hypotheses for non-inferiority or bioequivalence are shown.

The test decision, based on confidence intervals and the duality to the test problem, were discussed. A simple example of how to determine the acceptance range in a clinical trial was introduced. Problems with the constancy assumption and advances in standard of care were shown based on examples.

Further thoughts on populations, sample size and regulatory aspects as well as practical implementation in the protocol or statistical analysis plan were depicted.

 

New member of the Staburo team

New member of the Staburo team

We are very happy to welcome Julia Breitenbruch in our team. Julia will support our clients with her experience in the areas of statistical programming and biostatistics. We are looking forward to a great cooperation!

 

Training@Staburo: Multiple Imputation

Training@Staburo: Multiple Imputation

Multiple Imputation (MI) is a technique to replace missing data with substituted values. The promise of this method is to estimate less biased estimates compared to state-of-the-art methods like Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF).

In a MI approach, the same missing value is imputed multiple times in order to reduce noise in contrast to single imputation.

The introduced implementation is especially suited for the MI of longitudinal data. The approach utilizes the longitudinal information of the data to further minimize the prediction error of the imputation process.

Two step process for longitudinal data

The implementation is realized by a two step process. The first MI step serves as input for the second MI step. Step 1 uses an EM algorithm to impute the data until a monotone missing pattern is achieved. Monotone missing is achieved if the sequence of longitudinal information does not contain any “holes”. A hole is hereby a missing value between observed values, assuming a chronologic order in a longitudinal setting. This process is repeated m-times to get multiple imputations. The second step can utilize multiple prediction algorithms, e.g. regression, predictive mean matching or propensity score. However, the underlying process is always the same. Every remaining missing value is now predicted from the information that occurs earlier in the chronologically sequence.

After the imputation, the statistical analysis is done separately for every imputation dataset and the results are pooled according to Rubin’s Rules.

The talk discussed the practical implementation in SAS with proc MI.